Law and Humanity

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KESEHATAN (PENATA ANESTESI) SETELAH TERBITNYA UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2023

Gunawan Wahyudiono, Joko Ismono, Nuryanto A. Daim — Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 SE Asia Daylight Time

Anesthesiology services and intensive therapy in hospitals are part of health services that are developing rapidly in line with improvements in science and technology in the field of anesthesia. Law no. 17 of 2023 concerning Health provides a glimmer of hope that there will be a solution to meet the needs of specialist/subspecialist doctors in various regions. The formation of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health has proven to cause obstacles. The regulations tell how hospitals as an extension of the minister, provincial government and district/city government should act, how to respond and what sanctions there will be. However, the existence of anesthesia practitioners who practice without STRPA and SIPPA is an indication that the law is not working optimally in society.

IMPLEMENTASI PERDAGANGAN KARBON DI INDONESIA PASCA TERBITNYA POJK NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG BURSA KARBON

Suci Ariyanti, Suwarno Abadi, Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman — Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:39:43 SE Asia Daylight Time

POJK Number 14 of 2023 on Carbon Exchange is the Government's effort to create a carbon trading arrangement through a carbon exchange. Previously, the government issued two regulations related to carbon trading, namely Presidential Regulation Number 98 of 2021 and Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 21 of 2022. However, it turns out that these regulations still have weaknesses. This research is a normative legal research. The results show that after the enactment of POJK on Carbon Exchange, there are still weaknesses where the basis of paid-up capital as a carbon exchange organizer is exactly the same as the stock exchange rules listed in Article 3 POJK 3/2021. This provision is considered to make the carbon exchange exclusive. In addition, several rules in POJK 14/2023 such as the form of carbon trading is securities, so there will be delisting, even though carbon has no such thing as disappearing or delisting. In addition, Article 27 related to the terms and procedures of carbon exchange organizers must meet the principles of openness, access, and equal opportunity contradicts the definition of carbon as securities. This is because if the form of carbon exchange has become securities, then those who will enter will also be stock exchange players. Therefore, this regulation does not explain who can be involved in carbon trading other than the organizers. Individuals, cooperatives, communities, NGOs can be involved in carbon trading or not.

PEMBARUAN PENGATURAN PIDANA DEMI ERADIKASI PRAKTIK PROSTITUSI

Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:50:58 SE Asia Daylight Time

The rapid technological advancement nowadays accelerates the spread of various forms of information, including information regarding prostitution practices. Meanwhile, from a legal perspective, a complete regulation on prostitution practices is at its minimum, and thus the impacts of the prostitution practices affect health aspects and drives social turmoil in the community. This research aims to review regulations related to prostitution practices, especially in the applicable criminal law in Indonesia, and propose factors that emphasizes a law reform, so that in the future, prostitution practices may be handled more thoroughly. This research uses a normative method, with secondary data that includes literary research and reviews on laws and regulations as well as an analysis method that uses a prescriptive technique. The conclusion resulting from this research reveals that in reality, several regional regulations have regulated prostitution practices, but nationally, there has not been any regulation that strictly regulates prostitution practices. The suggestions proposed by the researcher for the future is in a preventive and repressive form, which are clear limitations of prostitution practices, criminal act reform for pimps, criminalization for commercial sex workers (PSK), the use of double-track system in imposing sanctions, criminal act formulation, and criminal aggravation.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN DALAM KASUS GAGAL BAYAR KLAIM ASURANSI DI INDONESIA

Juli Kushertin, Suwarno Abadi, Nuryanto A. Daim — Sat, 06 Apr 2024 08:33:54 SE Asia Daylight Time

Good corporate governance or better known as Good Corporate Governance is a value system that is a benchmark for a company's ability to carry out operational activities and business processes in a healthy manner. The Financial Services Authority (OJK), which was formed in accordance with Republic of Indonesia Law Number 21 of 2011, is not running effectively and is considered to have been negligent in its supervision process, resulting in actions involving deviant practices such as corruption and money laundering in the case of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya consumer failure to pay. Law enforcement in order to guarantee that the public gets their rights, consumers who fail to pay PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) have found a solution through restructuring. So that urgent changes can be implemented ably by the state, financial sector reform Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector exists as legal protection. Legal protection is carried out to restore trust. Legal protection is the state's effort to compile the achievements of the Indonesian Long Term Development Plan (RPJPN) 2025-2045 as part of legal development. The aim of the research is to determine law enforcement and legal protection from criminal acts of corruption in the financial sector which operates in the insurance sector, case study PT Asuransi Jiwasraya which has a progressive legal correlation of asset confiscation. The type of research, problem approach, theory used is normative legal research with a statutory approach with a conceptual approach. The theory used to analyze is the basic theory of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis. The research results show that the application of law and corporate legal protection from criminal acts of corruption in the Jiwasraya case study is intended to provide legal certainty and legal protection to help maintain the image of good government.

KEPASTIAN HUKUM MENGENAI PENETAPAN TERSANGKA UNTUK KEDUA KALINYA OLEH PENYIDIK PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI

Leo Dwi Prasetiyo, Rihantoro Bayu Aji — Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:24:28 SE Asia Daylight Time

The background of writing this journal article is the second time the determination of a suspect against Ilham Arief Sirajjudin (Petitioner), the former mayor of Makassar by investigators from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Previously, the Corruption Eradication Commission named the Petitioner as a suspect, but the Corruption Eradication Commission lost in pretrial because it named the Petitioner as a suspect but did not fulfill at least 2 valid pieces of evidence according to the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore the pretrial judge granted the Petitioner's request and declared the KPK's determination of the suspect invalid with decision number 32/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel on (Pretrial volume 1). Then, after the Pretrial Appellant was granted by the pretrial judge, several days later, the KPK again named the Petitioner as a suspect. However, the Petitioner again carried out pretrial efforts with one of his petitions namely that the Petitioner had won in the previous pretrial and the decision was final and binding on all parties, so if the KPK again named the Petitioner as a suspect it would create legal uncertainty for the Petitioner. However, in pretrial volume 2, the pretrial judge did not grant the Petitioner's request on the grounds that the KPK had determined the Petitioner according to procedure. And finally the Judge rejected the Petitioner's Pretrial with decision number 55/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel. In the Pretrial Decision of the South Jakarta District Court Number: 32/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel and 55/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel there are two legal issues that the author will raise in this journal article In this case, the first problem is related to the determination of a suspect for the second time by Corruption Eradication Commission investigators against someone whose pretrial has been granted in relation to the principle of legal certainty. The second legal issue is related to the principle of Ne bis in idem in the Criminal Code which is linked to decisions Number: 32/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel and 55/Pid.Prp/2015/Pn .Jkt.Sel regarding the determination of the suspect for the second time against someone. The purpose of writing a journal article to be achieved is to analyze the determination of a suspect for the second time by KPK investigators against someone who has been granted a pretrial based on the principle of legal certainty. Then the second objective is to analyze the existence of the Ne Bis In idem principle in the Criminal Code by pretrial decision regarding the determination of the suspect to return for the second time against someone. The conclusions drawn based on the writing of this journal article are first, the determination of a suspect for the second time against someone who has been granted pretrial by KPK investigators does not conflict with the principle of legal certainty, because pretrial is purely administrative or formal in nature. Therefore, if the investigator is still convinced that the person has committed a crime, the investigator can re-establish that person as a suspect through the correct legal procedures. The second conclusion, the principle of ne bis in idem in the Criminal Code does not apply to pretrial decisions regarding the determination of a suspect for the second time against someone, because pretrial is administrative (formal) in nature, namely it only has the authority to examine and decide legal matters, not forced efforts and provide protection of human rights in a person at the level of investigation and prosecution and not examining matters at the time of trial or the main case.